Some truths about Jerusalem and the Temple Mount
In the
Jewish Bible, Jerusalem is mentioned over 669 times and Zion (which usually means Jerusalem or, sometimes, the Land of Israel ) 154 times, for a total of 823 times. The
Christian Bible mentions Jerusalem 154 times and Zion 7 times. Jerusalem is not mentioned once in the Koran. Jerusalem is also not mentioned in the Palestinian
Covenant.
King David
established the city of Jerusalem as the capital of the whole Land of Israel . Mohammed never came to Jerusalem . Jerusalem remained under Turkish Ottoman Empire rule
from 1517 to 1917, and under British rule as trustee for the Jewish people from
1917 to 1948. The British violated that trust and that is part of the reason
for the conflict and bloodshed.
The Temple Mount in Jerusalem is the holiest site for Jews. It was the
site of the Beit HaMikdash ("Temple ") built by King Solomon (950 BCE),
which was destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar (587 BCE), rebuilt in 541 BCE, and then
destroyed again by the Roman army in 70 CE. That final Roman destruction led to
the exile of Jews from Israel . Al Aqsa Mosque and the Shrine of Omar on
the current Temple Mount were built at the site of the ancient
Jewish Temples. The Arabic name for Jerusalem , "el-KuDS", is derived from the
Arabic name, "BeT el-MaKDeS", which is a translation of the Hebrew,
"BeiT ha-MiKDaSH", the name of the Jewish Temple.
--
While I can’t
formally vouch for all of his (or her) numbers, I can tell you ‘YJ Draiman’ is, essentially, correct about how many times ‘Jerusalem ’ and ‘Zion ’ are mentioned in the Jewish Tanach.
His/her numbers may be off by 10-15 per cent, but the singular inference of the
comment is still valid: ‘Jerusalem ’ and ‘Zion ’ are mentioned so many times in the Jewish Tanach because
they are important to Judaism. They are not mentioned in the Quran because
they are not important to Islam.
Now, I’ve been
told that ‘Jerusalem ’ is in fact mentioned in the Quran—once or twice. I’ve
also been told that Mohammed came once (or, perhaps, twice) to Jerusalem . I’d be happy if someone could confirm
that.
Two or four
references, however, don’t change anything. The truth is, throughout Jewish
history, Jews have placed great importance on ‘Jerusalem ’ and ‘Zion ’. Muslims haven’t.
But in this war,
truth is irrelevant. You should remember that. The only ‘truth’ that counts in
this war is that Arabs are willing to die to take control of the Temple Mount . Most Jews don’t give a damn. Last night,
we read that almost 60 per cent of Jews in Israel do not support Jewish prayer on the Temple Mount ("Poll: 40% of Jewish Israelis Want
Jewish Prayer on Temple Mount ", Arutz Sheva, November
11, 2014 ). That
indifference could be deadly.
If the Arabs have
any say in this war, Jewish indifference will become the lever through which
Arabs will move the Jew off the Temple Mount .
Here’s another
truth for you: if we keep the Temple Mount , we can control Jerusalem . If we lose the Mount, you’ll have to
re-think Jerusalem .
You’ll have to
imagine how rioting Arabs will react if they successfully seal off the
Mount from Jews. With that 'victory', Arabs won't go home.
They'll go for the
rest of Jerusalem . How do you think that’ll
unfold?
The G-d of Israel has a Story for you. It’s the Story of the
Final Jewish Redemption. That Story involves a Jerusalem under attack. Our Sages teach that “Arab
nations will play a major role in the wars” that precede our Redemption (Yechezkeil,
trans. and commentary by Rabbi Moshe Eisemann, The ArtScroll Tanach Series,
2012, 38:6, note, p. 584).
Are these some of
the Arabs our Sages refer to?
What do you think?
No comments:
Post a Comment